Wednesday, 16 March 2011

The Quiet Earth (1985)-Review by Gavin Jennings

Hello People,
Another great review from the man Gavin Jnnings,The quiet earth,which i must admit i have not seen myself,but looks pretty good!
So thanks again Big Man Gav!
Jonny T.
The Quiet Earth (1985)





Hi guys, I am currently in the midst of a stomach bug that has kept me off work for a few days. In between frequent trips to the bathroom and the excitement of daytime television I have the opportunity to present you with my latest offering earlier than expected. I hope you enjoy this brief look at one of ‘Down Unders’ lesser known post-apocalyptic movies.

Imagine you wake up one morning and you are totally alone. Your neighbours are suspiciously quiet for a change, and there are no dogs barking or birds singing in the trees. Pans are left boiling on stoves and cars are left abandoned in the streets all over the town. Mysteriously, empty planes have dropped from the sky and the inferno that surrounds the wreckage burns uncontrollably in the absence of fire crews. Nobody answers your calls for help and the Police are nowhere to be found. It’s as if all life on Earth has vanished in an instant. What would you do? Zac Hobson, a self-centred scientist working on an experiment for global energy, finds himself in this predicament in this rarely seen sc-fi classic from New Zealand. Made on a shoe string budget in the mid 1980’s the film is immediately recognisable to the far more recent hits 28 days later and I am legend. The similarities end there though as The Quiet Earth isn’t as quick to introduce monsters or fast moving zombies as its protagonists. Instead the film concentrates on mankind’s frailty and the damage that we are causing by meddling with science.

Zac is quick to realise that the company he works for is responsible for the disaster and driven by guilt and loneliness soon descends into temporary madness. Wearing a dress and armed with a shotgun he surrounds himself with cardboard cut outs of famous historical figures and appoints himself as leader of the new world. On the verge of suicide he cleans up his act and comes across a lonely young woman by chance. Immediately he is attracted to Joanne and welcomes the companionship and brief romance that follows. Zac’s new found happiness is short lived however with the arrival of Api, a third survivor. He is younger, stronger, and better looking than Zac who is immediately suspicious and threatened by Api’s presence. Zac’s fears are realised when Joanne is drawn to the stranger and a love triangle develops.


The film adopts a slightly different tone in the second half which isn’t quite as enjoyable as watching Zac act out his darker inhibitions. As he delves deeper into his research Zac discovers that the initial event was actually the start of a chain reaction giving way to some cheap but truly psychedelic sequences that really stretched the $1 million dollar budget. The strain builds on the trio as the fabric of the Universe continues to unravel. Knowing that he has to share his dark secret with the others Zac discovers an opportunity to ultimately redeem himself for his involvement in ‘Project Flashlight’ and sets a plan in motion that leads to an explosive if somewhat confusing climax.

The ending is something of a wonder to most people who watch the movie. I have read a stream of reviews from fans of the movie on imdb and whilst most people have their own opinion of what the film means most agree that the Quiet Earth is fantastic. It has a very respectable 7.1 out of 10 rating which is quite an achievement for a director whose other credits include Free Jack, Under Siege 2, Fortress 2 and Young Guns 2 - Blaze of Glory! A lot of the Quiet Earth’s success is down to the superb script which manages to excite and entertain with a minimal cast and without an ounce of cheese or schlock that Hollywood likes so much. It was co-written by Bruce Lawrence, who plays Zac so brilliantly throughout the film. It’s a shame that he didn’t get a chance to write much else, after being diagnosed with lung cancer he passed away in 1995. Credit is also due to producer and co-writer Sam Pillsbury. As a testament to The Quiet Earth’s positivity an aspiring film-maker friend of mine was motivated to write an entirely new script after just one viewing of the movie. He sent his work to Sam Pillsbury, who had expressed an interest in making a new Quiet Earth project. In return he received some very positive feedback directly from Sam but weather anything comes from it remains to be seen. In the mean time I urge you to track down a copy of The Quiet Earth and experience it for yourself. Whatever you do avoid watching the trailer on the internet as it completely destroys any reason to watch the film in the first place... I’ve already done that for you here!
Gavin Jennings.



Tuesday, 15 March 2011

Cantonen Iron Kung Fu (1979)-Review By Robert R Best.

Hello Folks!
I'd like to welcome to the blog the great writer Robert R Best,Author of the Zombie classics "Ashton Memorial"and "Lakewood Memorial"if you not yet checked these out please head over to http://www.robertrbest.com/ and check his site out.
Now Robert and i were chatting on the gold old Twitter and he was looking to do some reviews for classic kung fu films and i do love a good old cheesy kung fu flick,so what will follow is some classics of the genre reviewed by Robert for your viewing pleasure,The first film to be reviewed is "Cantonen Iron Kung Fu"
Take it away Mr Best!



Cantonen Iron Kung Fu (1979)


Leung Kar-Yan plays Iron Bridge Kun, who is not yet called Iron Bridge Kun, but I’ve forgotten what he’s called early on in the movie. Let’s just call him Kun. Kun lives and works in the small village with all of his friends, who all work various jobs and like to have kung-fu contests with each other. At one point they also go and challenge two people who live at a temple. You’d think something would come of this. It does not.

Turns out there’s a bad guy in town who stresses how he can’t show his face. Not even to the camera. He doesn’t say that, but the camera respects his wishes and does not film his face. He would like to expand his power in the village. His minions laugh and agree. The head minion says he has a plan. He also says some guy named Jin (I think) is rumoured to be in town. This upsets big bad guy very much. He frets about it. But back to the plan the minions have to increase the bad guy’s power.

This plan consists of setting up a stage somewhere and challenging everyone in town to a fight. People come up one at a time and are killed. I’m not sure why the townsfolk don’t just mob the stage all at once. But oh well. The minions also hope their plan will bring Jin out of hiding. It doesn’t. At least not at first.

Anyway, remember Kun? One of his friends goes and challenges the minions and is killed. Kun is very upset and vows revenge. He goes and is almost killed himself but is rescued by a business owner named Mr. Lin. Mr. Lin knows kung fu. Kun begs Mr. Lin to teach him and Mr. Lin eventually agrees.

While this is going on, the minions continue their stage plan/quest to find Jin. Many of Kun’s friends are killed and Kun gets more and more upset. The head minion kills Mr. Lin and Kun goes after him.

Jin finally reveals himself and helps Kun fight the head minion. Kun wins the fight and is dubbed “Iron Bridge Kun” by the town for his exploits. Jin explains he’s some sort of cop or something and he’s in town looking for the big bad guy. The camera, apparently emboldened by all of this, finally films the big bad guy. We’ve never seen him before so no big twist there. Anyway, Kun and Jin eventually have a big show down with big bad guy in a nice long final fight.


Which brings me to the fighting. I’ve spent several paragraphs now being snarky about the plot, because it is a little convoluted and confusing. But the fights are really pretty good. Especially the one at the end. They’re well choreographed and well filmed, with lots of good ideas in them. Like when Kun punches a guy and breaks both his neck and the tree behind him. Stuff like that. It’s cool, and the fights make the plot worth it. Especially if you can handle convoluted plots.

A few words on the edition I saw. It was called “Iron Kung Fu” on the case and came as a double feature with “Tiger Over Wall.” The picture was just so-so and there were some weird sound issues. The volume would go up and down and at some points the music was louder than the dialogue. And it had one of those classic 70s/80s dubs with all the cheese-ball voices you’ve heard a million times on a million English dubs. It was packaged in a slim case and cost exactly one dollar. It was certainly worth fifty cents.

So overall I guess I recommend it. I would certainly be interested in seeing a better edition of the movie. I enjoyed it. The plot was fun to chuckle at and the action was honestly good.

Robert R Best.

Friday, 11 March 2011

A Witch's hat Tribute To Jonnys Cult Films!

Hello people,
I have been fortunate to recieve this great video tribute to me and of course all of you involved at Jonny's cult films from the Great RootRot From the witch's hat blog.
What a nice man,what a great blog,Pretty much a new post everyday with help from Misfitboy,Biguglyhairyscary and many others,Also Check out his Podcast and Vidcast and everything on there,
Mr RootRoot i thank you Doodle Buddy.
Jonny t.
Link to the Witch's hat Blog-
Click Here to view and follow the Blog-------> http://thewitchshatblog.com/

STOP PRESS!!!!

The Witches hat blog has been nominated for an award over at TLAcult site along with other great blogs such as motion picture massacre and Mcbastards mausoleum ,so please go vote!
You do have more than one vote so,get clicking here to vote--------> TLA CULT VIDEO AWARDS

A Witch's hat Tribute To Jonnys Cult Films!






Tuesday, 8 March 2011

Werewolves-The Genre Defined!

Hello folks,
I would like to thank my friend at Angry puppy films on this great take on all things within the werewolf genre,Be sure to check out his great site Angry puppy films. and follow him on Twitter for great updates!!
Thanks my friend,
Enjoy,
Jonny T!

Werewolves


I love a good werewolf movie. The problem is, I like a bad werewolf movie too. Keep that in mind as you read this and judge accordingly. My first screenplay was a modern werewolf story. Hopefully, someday I will get a chance to make the film. I wanted to take a moment and go over the genre a bit and Jonny was kind enough to provide a forum.

Firstly, who am I? I’m an American independent film-maker, writer, producer and a lifelong horror fan. What makes me the guy to ask about this? I love horror. I write horror. I’m one of you. You know the crazy guys in Hyde Park wearing sombreros and shouting their opinions to all within earshot? I’m in Texas and shouting in the UK.

Let’s start off with defining what good werewolf movies have in common.

Great settings.


The shadowy moors of An American Werewolf in London (1981) sets a creepy mood that forms a perfect contrast as our two heroes run in the dark to their deaths. Even the pub The Slaughtered Lamb adds to the establishment of a feeling of impending doom. The original Wolf Man (1941) accomplished the same thing on a sound stage with brilliant use of lighting and shadows. Brotherhood of the Wolf (2001) managed to capitalize on historical events and make even a sunny country-side scene exceptionally scary. A creepy setting can make anything scary for a moment but only for that moment.

Transformations



Watching our hero change from man to beast can be brilliant as it was in the earlier An American Werewolf in London and to a lesser degree in the more recent Wolfman (2010). The transformation needs to be believable and not pull the viewer out of the suspended reality of a movie. Watching Benicio del Torro’s fingers snap in Wolfman elicited groans from audiences as they were pulled into the scene. However, in The Howling (1981) the transformation scene in the theater is classic because of what isn’t seen as much as what is seen.

Attacks



Let’s just admit it, we love gore. A good attack can scare you witless or leave you wondering where the good movie is playing. Dog Soldiers (2002) had great attacks throughout. A sudden lunge from the shadows and our heroes are wolf chow. The attacks can be brutally violent as in Wolfman or subtly implied as in the Howling.

Comedy is not necessary


When good ideas go wrong. The Howling 2: Your Sister is a Werewolf suffers from lack of commitment to horror. Comedy can help as it did in an American Werewolf in London or completely ruin a movie as it did the Howling 2:Your Sister is a Werewolf (1985). Don’t get me wrong, Sybil Danning naked could redeem almost any movie, but this one suffered to the point that even she couldn’t pull this thing out of the clearance bin.

Nudity



Since I mentioned it, let’s talk about nudity for a moment. I am a heterosexual male. I like naked women. They get my attention every time. The film-maker in me says that the nudity has to be relevant to the plot, but honestly, sometimes that isn’t necessary. Monica Belucci’s nude scenes in Brotherhood of the Wolf weren’t necessary but they were greatly appreciated. Who can forget Elisabeth Brooks in the original Howling standing naked and wild? David Naughton waking up naked in the zoo caused many appreciative stares in An American Werewolf in London. Sex and horror have gone hand in hand forever and probably will continue so folks need to get used to it and move along.



CGI
 
I don’t hate CGI. I prefer special effects to be done in camera, but in the real world of film making sometimes that doesn’t work. Cost and risks can make it necessary to use a computer instead of risking cast and certain death. It is here to stay, so we all need to get over our dislike and accept the fact.




There’s more but Jonny wanted some content and not a book. Want to make a great werewolf movie? Watch the ones I mention above. Get a character that people can relate to and have them cursed. Then unleash them on their loved ones and general population. Do not have them turn into hairy funny versions of themselves.



Werewolves are about the beast within each of us finding a way to get out into the world. Though we don’t like to admit it, each of us has the propensity to give into our wild side. Freud called it the id, but for here, it is our inner wolf. Werewolf movies can be great horror or train wrecks.





Great Werewolf films

Wolf Man (1941)

An American Werewolf in London (1981)

Brotherhood of the Wolf (2001)

Dog Soldiers (2002)

Underworld (2003)

Skinwalkers (2006)

Wolfman (2010)



Bad Werewolf films

Really? Did you expect me to slam someone’s favorite film? Someone put their heart and soul into making that film, so cut them some slack. Yeah, I know I was kind of harsh on the Howling 2, but really, fur on Sybil’s naked chest? Yes, I am holding a grudge against one scene. Christopher Lee was brilliant as usual. Ok, I admit I bought the DVD as well.


Follow me on twitter or just sound off with your opinion. I know that I have missed some here so let me know what I missed. I am @angrypuppyfilms and I thank you for your time and Jonny for loaning me the soapbox.




Classic transformation scene from"An American werewolf in London"

Tuesday, 1 March 2011

Emmas Miike Marathon



 As some of you lovely people may already know, 2011 is the year of my 'Miike Marathon'. My challenge is to watch as many of, contraversial Japanese director, Takashi Miikes films as possible. For some reason, Jonny thinks you might like to hear how I'm getting on (to give him a rest from it all, i imagine) so, its been decided that, once a week(ish) I'll be doing a little review, to keep you up to date.

If I'm honest, I'm not actually sure how I've ended up with this challenge, it seemed like a good idea at the time and, well, once you've mentioned it to a couple of people, you cant go back!  I'd already seen what you would think of as some of his more mainstream films, Ichi, Audition, Three Extremes etc but I think it was The Happiness of the Katakuris that really sold Miike to me. A musical with zombies, what more could anyone want from a film?!


 While sorting out the Monster/Film Room i found a pile of DVDs I'd brought cheap from a rental place that was closing down. This must have been at least 2 years ago, and I've still not watched them. In that pile there was quite a lot of Miikes stuff that I haven't seen, Dead or Alive, Shinjuku thing thing, Agitator and more. So, combine that with a tiny (but completely healthy) obsession with anything Japanese and the Miike Marathon was born.

This year, Mikkes 83rd title, as director, will be released (hence the Marathon part of the challenge!) If you want to see a list of what i'll be attempting to watch click HERE.. Dito if you want anymore info on the man himself.

There probably should have a plan of attack for this, but as this is me were talking about, there isn't. I've just sort of fallen into this, so i didn't start watching his films in any order. I'm also struggling to find quite a bit of his early stuff, so its not going to be a chronological look at his work. To group it into genre would be a pain in the arse, mainly because i don't want to end up watching a load of yakuza films in a row. So, for that reason, we're winging it!  


I'm, by no stretch of the imagination, a film buff or writer so you'll have to bear with me and excuse the waffle and excessive use of exclamation marks!!!! This is gonna be a massive learning curve for me, so if you want to throw some advice or (constructive)criticism my way, feel free.

Some of you may also be happy to hear that due to my overenthusiastic buying of DVDs and lack of organisation, I've doubled up on a couple so you do get a competition too.
A bribe so you come back for more?

Maybe!

The first of his films I'm going to be reviewing is Blues Harp, a yukuza film from 1998. Its not one of his more shocking or violent films, but i loved the characters and story, it has lots of his usual themes running through it. Also, the use of music in the intro is bloody fantastic. Anyway, the trailer is below.
 Hope to see you next week.


Saturday, 26 February 2011

A look back at John Carpenters Christine by Gavin Jennings.

Hello Folks,
Yet another great piece from Gavin Jennings for the blog,Read his retrospective with incredible detail and how his mums reading of Stephen kings books saved his life!Also included are 2 fantastic pictures:-
1-Gavin's replica Christine licence plate.
2-His daughters drawing of Christine(did you let her watch it Gav???)
Many thanks to Gavin and to you all for looking,
Jonny t.

A look back at John Carpenters Christine by Gavin Jennings.

I think it's fair to say that Stephen King's career through the seventies and eighties deserves to stand out in history alongside JK Rowling, Tolkien, and even Shakespeare as genre defining literature. Every project he released was more successful than the last and film studios were clambering over themselves to convert his latest bestseller to celluloid. Even at a young age I was aware of his presence in the Jennings household. My mum loved his early works almost as much as I loved the ramps that his hardcovers made for my Matchbox cars. But on a serious note it has to be said that I owe my life to Stephen King's Christine. Were it not for my mum reading that book only week's before it is unlikely that I would be here now writing for Jonnys cult films on this dreary Monday morning. It was around 1984 and I was eating my tea with a friend from school when I started to choke on a chip butty. Luckily my mum now knew what the Heimlich manoeuvre was from remembering a chapter in the book. She was able to open my air way but not before I had turned a nice shade of blue!


A little while later my parents rented John Carpenters Christine from the local video shop. I was allowed to watch it despite the bad language, it would be allot later in life before I understood the true meaning of words like Fuck, Shitter or Cuntingham anyway. I was amazed at what I saw. I already loved cars but watching a film about a car that could drive itself and even kill people was just fantastic. I became obsessed other movies that featured supernatural vehicles such as Killdozer, Duel, The Car, Herbie, Maximum Overdrive, The Wraith, The Blues Brothers, etc. I practically had a melt down when I discovered toy cars that turned into robots later that year. Anyway, Ive digressed. Christine holds a special place in my heart and I will cherish it forever. I hope you enjoy reading this article as much as I have writing it...

The foundations for what would go on to become John Carpenter's Christine were being laid during the production of another of Stephen King's successful screen adaptations, the 1979 epic TV mini-series Salem's Lot. At this point the novel Christine existed only in King's mind. Movie executive Richard Kobritz was producing the vampire best seller along with horror director Tobe Hooper. Stephen approved of how his novel was being translated and offered Kobritz first refusal on his upcoming manuscripts. This was very much the golden hand shake for Richard Kobritz as King's work was largely unchallenged at this point in American literature. Shortly after Salem's Lot had been released Richard received the manuscript for Cujo, the story of a loving family dog driven crazy by the scratch from a rabid bat. He respectfully declined what would go on to be a success in it's own right, feeling that the book just wasn't the project he was looking for at that time. In 1982 Kobritz was sent a preview of King's latest work entitled Christine. Immediately he loved the story of uber nerd Arnie and his jalopy from hell and bought the movie rights.

Richard had John Carpenter in mind to direct Christine. John was still reeling from the luke warm reception of his latest picture 'The Thing' and was looking for work. He found the characters interesting, liked the story and signed up. Carpenter & Kobritz now needed somebody to adapt Stephen King's massive novel into a film that would run in at under two hours. John had previously worked with little known screen writer Bill Phillips on an unreleased version of Firestarter. Seeing the potential in Christine's plot before he had even finished reading the story Bill immediately got on board and started work on condensing the plot. A large portion of King's novel revolved around Christine's previous owner Roland LeBay. As the story progresses Arnie begins to see Rolands rotting corpse taunting him from the back seat more and more. John agreed when Bill suggested that they remove his character completely since American werewolf in London, which was only released the year before, had a very similar premise. This would mean major changes to the story but removing this ghostly aspect allowed much more freedom to focus on Christine's possessive character. They also decided to shoot a different opening to the book which would show Christine being born on a Detroit production line. Allot of the cars that were being used all had to be sprayed white so that Christine's red bodywork really stood out. This was one of the first scenes to be filmed as the cars had to be made up like Christine again afterwards. Some character deaths were changed for cinematic effect or removed altogether. John decided that he wanted the killings to remain a mystery throughout his film. He opted to have the windshields blackened during the action scenes so it was impossible to tell who or what was driving Christine. Stephen King's epilogue, although wonderful, was also left out.

Up to this point Stephen King's novel had not yet been released to the general public. It came out in April 1983 to much applaud from both critics and readers. It was a huge hit and went straight to the number one spot on the New York Times best seller list. In that same month filming was approved by Columbia Pictures who had previously expressed an interest in releasing the film shortly after Kobritz had acquired the rights. They invested almost $10 million dollars into Christine but all creative control was in the hands of John Carpenter and Richard Kobritz. As with his previous films Carpenter had his name above the title and he would use his trademark self penned score as well as some cleverly picked rock n roll classics for the soundtrack. John had overall say on the final cut and he and Kobritz decided who would be cast.

It was decided very early on that the car had to be the star in this movie therefore Carpenter insisted on a largely unknown cast of young actors. He didn't agree with the studio's choice of Scott 'Bugsy Malone' Baio and Brooke 'Blue Lagoon' Shields as the films leads and arranged auditions for suitable actors in California. This was proving to be difficult and with the exception of the role of Dennis going to John Stockwell, Richard Kobritz had to go further a field for the other characters. He set up auditions in New York City and at one point thought he had found the role of Arnie in a young Kevin Bacon. He was given the part but had to turn it down after being offered leading man in upcoming dance flick Footloose. The search continued and eventually Keith Gordon was interviewed. John recognised him from Jaws 2 but he had not done any film work for a while. He proved to be a gifted actor and was perfect for the movies Jackyll & Hyde style role. Next to be cast was young and inexperienced actress Alexandra Paul who would be Leigh Cabot, Christine's rival for Arnie's affections. Robert Prosky was a revelation as mean-spirited junk yard owner Will Darnell as were screen veterans Roberts Blossom and Harry Dean Stanton in supporting roles.

Since Stephen King had already decided on Christine being a 1958 red Plymouth Fury the crew had no choice but to track down as many cars as the budget would allow. '58 Fury's were a rare model so similar looking Savoy's and Belvedere's were used to make up approximately twenty four vehicles that were purchased and cannibalised for the various scenes and stunts that would be needed throughout the production. By the end of filming less than four cars survived, much to the horror of classic car enthusiasts. However, the popularity of the movie would ensure that any remaining '58 Plymouth's would now be guaranteed a secure future in the collector market, much like the Delorean after Back to the future.

Contrary to the the books setting of Pennsylvania the film was set in and around California on locations similar to John's earlier film Halloween. The location manager found a gigantic disused wire factory from world war two that would serve two purposes. One half would be Darnell's Junk yard where Arnie restores Christine and the other side was a repair workshop for the many different Plymouths. An entire petrol station set had to be built from scratch for the complex scene where Christine takes her revenge on Buddy Repperton's gang. Not only did the script call for the set to be completely destroyed in a fireball but Christine had to be driven out of the explosion completely engulfed in flames and then down the highway ablaze. CGI wasn't an option so everything had to be created manually. Stunt co-ordinator Terry Leonard was in the driving seat the whole time dressed head to toe in full airplane fire fighting attire. He couldn't see anything and his oxygen was very limited, not to mention the tank of gasoline that was underneath him! The end result was a sequence that almost thirty years later still looks phenomenal. One of my favourite scenes has to be the regeneration scene where Christine exposes Arnie to her supernatural prowess for the first time. Using a relatively simple hydraulic set up John shot the car being pulled in with the cameras turned upside down. When the footage is played in reverse the upturned angle is flipped and removes the need to digitally process the print. Eagle eyed watchers will have probably noticed on repeated viewings that there are large inconsistencies in relation to the damage occurred by the pulley's to the vandalism caused by Repperton's crew. Regardless of it's flaws the entire scene gives the film a much needed boost from the character development and has been a talking point amongst fans and amateur film makers for years.

Christine opened in US theatres in December of '83. The hardback novel was still in the charts and the paperback was the number one best seller in the country. The film was very well received by horror fans and the critics. Time magazine said that it was Carpenter's best film since Halloween but some were offended with it's ripe dialogue. Since the movie wasn't particularly gory the film makers had to ensure that it would get it's R rating so Bill Phillips was tasked with spicing up the script and finding different uses for the word Fuck. As a result the New York Times said that Christine was the most foul mouthed language film in the history of English speaking cinema. Fortunately Scarface premiered just a week earlier and any negative publicity was quickly directed towards that. Christine grossed over $20 million in it's seven week run in North American cinemas and has developed a steady cult following in the twenty seven years that have followed. Both John Stockwell and Keith Gordon are now fairly successful directors in their own right and Alexandra Paul, who was regular on Baywatch for sometime, is still acting. Richard Kobritz never produced another Stephen King project after Christine and Bill Phillips continues to write smaller productions. Most horror fanatics are fully aware of the continued success that John Carpenter had during the eighties. Like Stephen King his career has been on the decline since then with some lack lustre movies and producing a truely awful re-make of his own classic the Fog. His latest film The Ward promises to be abit of a return to form and is released early this year. I am genuinely looking forward to seeing it. As for Christine, well the beautiful red '58 Plymouth Fury has undoubtedly earned her eternal place in movie history and will continue to grace us with her presence in occasional screen cameo's for generations to come...
Gav.
Gavin's"Christine"Replica license plate!


Gavin's daughters great art work,a horror fan in the making!


Wednesday, 23 February 2011

Splice Review by Dark ugh

Hello all,
I am pleased to welcome a good friend from NewZeland to the blog,known only as"Dark ugh"He is a fantastic artist so please go visit his blog and show your support,For this review he will be reviewing"Splice".
Many thanks Mr Dark!
Click here to visit his great blog----->http://darkugh.blogspot.com/


 
Splice 2009



Director Vincenzo Natali


Starring Adrien Brody, Sarah Polley and Delphine Chanéac

The first thing to remember in life (or is that just film?) is that science is bad, or at least evil when you don't do it properly. In the same way that sex, camping & lakes don't go together, if you try to mix the wrong things up, you will end up in trouble. For proof, see previous films like "The Fly", "Re-animator", "Frankenstein" or even "Weird Science" - well maybe not weird science.
So in this case, Splice doesn't completely break new ground. Mix Human DNA with any other you can find, chuck it into an artificial womb & wait for the mixture to rise. Add to the mix a suspect family past and you have recipe bound to give you problems (can't say food poisoning, that's just going too far with the analogy)
Splice is a pretty straight forward film focused around a scientist couple blessed with too much zeal and bugger all morality. They bend (snap?) the rules in a rush to beat a funding lock down and end up creating a sentient being well beyond any ones expectations.
The creature they make is really the highlight of the film. At first cute then later nasty, it handily grows from sweet tadpole to malevolent adult very quickly. Things get more disturbing when it starts to develop a sexy side, providing the film with some uncomfortable moments - in the "Is this sexy or is this horrible?' kind of way.

The two leads work well together but I found their flip-flop decision making a bit frustrating, but I guess it was necessary to carry the plot along.
Splice definitely reminded me of early Croneburg, especially Shivers or maybe Rabid. The early hybrid slug creatures could easily be one of his. The fact that the film was filmed in Canada seemed to be quite fitting.

To summarise, is this an essential Sci-Creature-B-Horror? No. It isn't as unusual as the directors first and quite superb film 'Cube' (1997). Its no gore fest, but for a good evenings entertainment in the form of a well paced, interesting story with some good effects and a scary creature its worth the watch.

3 stars (out of 5)